Men in Robes

It is important to understand what Roe v Wade IS and what it is NOT.  It was SUPPOSED to be the end to the abortion debate; put to rest forever.  Has it done that?  No.  But the Left wants no discussion about any but it's own opinion: abortion on demand until birth.  And they think that is good law?

We approach the adjudication of law as a moral people with police powers.  This is not the same as what the Supreme Court does which is to decode law based on the Constitution.  Yet, the Left, who, most of the time, hates our Constitution and wants it gone, relies so heavily on it here that we have had 40 years of crappy law.  States fight constantly in the confines of poorly written law to keep abortion factories from full-scale operation where baby parts are sold for sums of money and women have a "fall-back" option should they forget to use contraception in the heat of the moment.  Now, that fallback option will be limited by state legislatures.  

According to the Liberal Alan Dertchowitz, Dodd was the wrong case with which to grapple w Roe.  It should have been another case, further down the road, he argues.  Meanwhile in Florida, they passed a law that abortion will not be legal after the 15th week.  This, of course, would have been challenged with the Left's seemingly unending resources.  Would that have been the right decision to challenge Roe for Dr. Derschowitz?  What the good Dr. Derschowitz forgets is that his Party has threatened to pack the court.  With that threat hanging over the justices, Sam Alito  knew that it was time.  

Some people liken abortion to cosmetic surgery, others, the murder of a baby, no matter the view of it, it is a moral question, and in our Constitution, moral questions belong with the States.  As much as the Left would love to have the Kings at the SCOTUS decide the fate of abortion in America, we cannot codify every moral question in the law of the land.  Some of these important questions are meant to be discussed, debated, and legislated as close to the people as possible.  

Aristotle argues that there is some good in all voluntary actions. Is abortion good? My thought is that it can be good, but primarily, it is not.  Whatever happened to "safe and rare?" Roe did not give us Safe and Rare, it gave us body parts for sale.  Safe and Rare will, I'm certain, except in NY and CA, be the norm with the debate held by the State legislators.  I contend that a large majority of the people in the US believe that abortion should be a safe option available to a pregnant woman up to 12/15 weeks.  That will be the outcome of the Supreme Court's dastardly reversal of Roe in most states.

But the Communist Left doesn't care about reasonable, debated, locally considered laws that limit abortion to 12-15 weeks.  I contend that Abortion is yet another point of division the Communist uses to create political chasms in American society.  

The Left will not be there for you years later when you grapple as an adult with a decision to abort your child at Sixteen.  They don't care.  What could the Left possibly care about in this fight?  

They care about Black people.  Nope.  The founder of Planned Parenthood's stated strategy was to decrease the entry into this world of Black people because she was a racist.   I'm sure PP now downplays the Margaret Sanger agenda, but the fact is that she has been successful beyond her wildest dreams.  

The Left cares that women should control all decisions about their own bodies.  You have simply to look at the Left's reaction to Covid 19 to realize that isn't true.  The Left led the charge to shame, fire, and cancel those who chose not to take the Covid vaccine.  But the Left has never prided itself on consistent, logical behavior.

When the Kings who are Supreme Court justices upheld Roe for years on end, the Left lifted them up, beatified them.  But now, with careful consideration of what most scholars, including the tenacious Ruth Bader Ginsburg, believed was poorly written law that created a right to privacy out of whole cloth during the commission of what eventually results in the termination of life, the Left HATES the Kings.  They chant slogans, burn down Pregnancy help centers and generally throw a tantrum, but that's OK with their media friends because they are justified in their emotional outburst according to the "journalists" at CNN, MSNBC, ABC and CBS, not to mention Politico, the Huffington Post and The Daily Beast.  This decision to throw the moral question of abortion back to the people, or the "States," takes away a right, according to these "journalists," and when has a right that was given ever been taken away in our looong history of 248 years, they scream.  

Hmm.  I can think of several examples of the SCOTUS reversing wrong-headed decisions: slavery being the most obvious.  But we live in a time when our history means little but a reference to whatever supports one's cause whether it is true or not.  We are not REALLY supposed to look hard at history, unless it is to say that Jefferson, Franklin, etc., meant "musket" when referring to an "armed" populace.  The Left uses 'history" when it suits their purpose and never particularly well.

If we give our Federal Government powers not enumerated in the Constitution, it may someday abuse those powers.  The recent Covid experience where the Executive abused its powers by relying on OSHA regulations to require people to show up to work vaccinated or lose their jobs is an excellent example.  Imagine that one day, and it could be very close at hand, your Federal Government  requires that you get an abortion if you already have a child.   The Left never thinks about the Federal Government that abuses its powers as long as their narrative is safely supported.  But those who care about freedom do think about it.  I hope that the decision to reverse Roe v Wade will preserve our freedoms for a little while longer in this very scary world.

 

Sex Communists

 The Left wants to sexualize your children.  They are telling you this loud and clear.  This is no longer about gender identity, this is about the control the Leftist will exert over your child's sexual identity.  It is wrong. It is not a Teacher's job to become sex counselors to children in grade school.  Teachers have no training in sex counseling and, frankly, would you trust your child's counseling on sex or any other subject to your school's counselor?  We must stand against Hollywood, Blackrock-influenced Corporations, and major news outlets.  I say, Straight, Straight, Straight!  Screw Gay-baiting Communists.  I'm done with them and their social influencing.  It's time for the rise of the Straights back to the pinnacle of our society.  

Families are the cornerstone of any healthy, growing society.  Throughout history, governments have given incentives to the traditional family to promote its development.  They were not homophobes, they were practical.  Nobody gives a damn if you are gay, bisexuality, frankly, any one's sexual proclivities are nothing that interests me until you try to influence my child.  I grew up during the early Seventies when my school stressed color blind behavior and acceptance of all lifestyles.  I had a sexual education class in 5th grade that focused on anatomy and heterosexual sex.  It was not unusual to hear, in my world, about same-sex couples and though it didn't interest me, I also developed no long-lasting, deep-seated hatred for homosexuals.  It was a time when acceptance was the norm and the color of your skin was far less important than imagination, innovation, recycling, and earth-centered ideas.  1972 Spokane World's Fair was all about re-using materials, revising packaging, and developing new ways to think about how humans affect their environment.

I did not begin to fear or loath militant homosexuals until 1986 when I ran into a lesbian in San Diego at a political protest who told me, in no uncertain terms, that, "We're coming after your Babies & they will all be gay by the time we're done."  Can you imagine if I had told her that, "I'm coming after all you queers and I'm going to turn you straight?"  This was my first introduction to the Communist, power-hungry, militant Homosexual lobby and you can include in that group the NAMBLA folks who are the "Men and Young Boys" lobby.  They make no bones about the fact that they support the normalization of grown men having sex with young boys.  If this were all between consenting adults, I would have no issues with these people, but that is not their intent.  They are talking about sex with YOUNG boys who do not have a developed sexuality.  If you read their rather shocking literature, they seek to convert young boys to the life of subservience to an older man.  Nope.  Not kidding.

It is my contention that the normalization of militant queer behavior will lead to the downfall of our society.  There is clearly no progeny created in these types of relationships (easily), and, for those who are caught up in this web of radical behavior, there is the distinct possibility of subjugating those who may develop normal heterosexual family life to the mad, mad world of the radical gays.  I don't care about those who are physically predisposed to be homosexual; I support their human need for same sex relationships.  I even support a gay couple's need for family and children.  I was not raised in a Biblical household, though my mother later joined the Orthodox Church in America, my childhood allowed for the acceptance of non-traditional lifestyles.  

But our family also saw the devastation that comes from gender confusion and the horror of a life ruined by trying to live two lifestyles and failing at both.  Sometimes, people just need love, no matter where it comes from and perhaps the genitalia and how it plays a part in the relationship should be far less important than commraderie, support, family, and acceptance.  

My grandmother once said that she wished the 70-year old mind could be implanted for a day in the 21-year old body.  She said her perspective on life was so much more clear as an older human and that hormones should not rule the day in life decisions.  Wise woman.

We cannot allow those who are seeking only power to rule the day in our society.  Do you honestly believe that these groups who want to sexualize your children really care about those children?  When that child approaches puberty as a gender-confused, hormonal-affected human, do you think the Liberal will be there to pick up the pieces of a broken soul?  Not hardly.  They move on to their next fear-inducing, power-grabbing idea and your child will be left alone with no support other than their possibly estranged family to deal with the ramifications of the queer, mulri-partner lifestyle.

What if your child is simply shy?  What if they just need love and they find it momentarily in the arms of the same sex, but if given the support and love of a community, a church, a strong family, they would have chosen a traditional heterosexual relationship with children and grand children in later years?  Should our society promote the gay lifestyle in a time when we so desperately need traditional families to thrive in our world?  I'm not talking about the obvious gay person.  I'm talking about those who could be "turned" at vulnerable times in their lives, but that would be happier in a traditional family environment.  If you think that the Liberal Communist who now seeks power through fear-mongering in our society will be there to pick up the pieces of your child's life after years of wasting time in a non-traditional relationship when they should have gotten married and had kids, you would be wrong.  THEY DONT CARE.

These power hungry people are fear mongers and hate-promoters who care nothing for your child accept to use them to call you a homophobe and create division in our society.

Long live the Heterosexual.  Down with the militant Gay Lobby.  We need FAMILIES!  We need children who grow up, get married and have children and if a small percentage of our society does otherwise, fine.  I am not here to hate on them; but I AM here to support our society and it's culture that has grown and thrived with largely heterosexual families.